Satanic Temple, The v. Belle Plaine, City of
|
| |
| Satanic Temple, The v. Belle Plaine, City of | |
|---|---|
| Filing Date | |
| Original Jurisdiction | |
| Plaintiff | The Satanic Temple Inc. |
| Defendant | |
| Intervenor | N/A |
| State | |
| Case# | |
| Original Result | |
| First Appeal | N/A |
| Second Appeal | N/A |
| Final Result | |
Judge Dismisses Majority of Claims in Satanic Temple Lawsuit
- Nine out of 10 claims the Satanic temple made against the city of Belle Plaine in a lawsuit over a whether one of their monuments could be erected in Veteran's Park have been dismissed.
- U.S. Judge Wilhelmina Wright threw out the Temple's claims that the city's actions violated their free speech and exercise of religion.
- The remaining claim alleges that the city more or less breached a contract when they rescinded a permit allowing the monument.
- The Temple's attorney Matt Kezhaya told the Star Tribune that he plans to determine which of the dismissed claims can be raised again in a refiled complaint.