|
|
| Filing Date |
|
|---|
| Original Jurisdiction |
|
|---|
| Plaintiff |
The Satanic Temple Inc. |
|---|
| Defendant |
|
|---|
| Intervenor |
N/A |
|---|
| State |
|
|---|
| Case# |
0:19-cv-01122-WMW-JFD |
|---|
| Original Result |
|
|---|
| First Appeal |
N/A |
|---|
| Second Appeal |
N/A |
|---|
| Final Result |
|
|---|
|
|
| Filing Date |
|
|---|
| Original Jurisdiction |
|
|---|
| Plaintiff |
The Satanic Temple Inc. |
|---|
| Defendant |
|
|---|
| Intervenor |
N/A |
|---|
| State |
|
|---|
| Case# |
0:2021cv00336 |
|---|
| Original Result |
|
|---|
| First Appeal |
N/A |
|---|
| Second Appeal |
N/A |
|---|
| Final Result |
|
|---|
Judge Dismisses Majority of Claims in Satanic Temple Lawsuit
- Nine out of 10 claims the Satanic temple made against the city of Belle Plaine in a lawsuit over a whether one of their monuments could be erected in Veteran's Park have been dismissed.
- U.S. Judge Wilhelmina Wright threw out the Temple's claims that the city's actions violated their free speech and exercise of religion.
- The remaining claim alleges that the city more or less breached a contract when they rescinded a permit allowing the monument.
- The Temple's attorney Matt Kezhaya told the Star Tribune that he plans to determine which of the dismissed claims can be raised again in a refiled complaint.