Satanic Temple, The v. Belle Plaine, City of: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(creating Initial article for lawsuit) |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
: The Temple's attorney Matt Kezhaya told the Star Tribune that he plans to determine which of the dismissed claims can be raised again in a refiled complaint. | : The Temple's attorney Matt Kezhaya told the Star Tribune that he plans to determine which of the dismissed claims can be raised again in a refiled complaint. | ||
[[Category:Lawsuits]] |
Revision as of 01:46, 10 October 2021
Judge Dismisses Majority of Claims in Satanic Temple Lawsuit
- Nine out of 10 claims the Satanic temple made against the city of Belle Plaine in a lawsuit over a whether one of their monuments could be erected in Veteran's Park have been dismissed.
- U.S. Judge Wilhelmina Wright threw out the Temple's claims that the city's actions violated their free speech and exercise of religion.
- The remaining claim alleges that the city more or less breached a contract when they rescinded a permit allowing the monument.
- The Temple's attorney Matt Kezhaya told the Star Tribune that he plans to determine which of the dismissed claims can be raised again in a refiled complaint.