Satanic Temple, The v. Belle Plaine, City of: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Lawsuits | |||
| title={{PAGENAME}} | |||
| image= | |||
| caption= | |||
| filedate= | |||
| jurisdiction= | |||
| plaintiff=The Satanic Temple Inc. | |||
| defendant= | |||
| intervenor=N/A | |||
| state= | |||
| case= | |||
| result= | |||
| appeal1=N/A | |||
| appeal2=N/A | |||
| appeal3=N/A | |||
| finalresult= | |||
}} | |||
[http://www.belleplaineherald.com/news/judge-dismisses-majority-of-claims-in-satanic-temple-lawsuit/article_b3fd3348-d8bd-11ea-a201-7f47d8a4cb85.html Judge Dismisses Majority of Claims in Satanic Temple Lawsuit] | [http://www.belleplaineherald.com/news/judge-dismisses-majority-of-claims-in-satanic-temple-lawsuit/article_b3fd3348-d8bd-11ea-a201-7f47d8a4cb85.html Judge Dismisses Majority of Claims in Satanic Temple Lawsuit] | ||
Revision as of 04:55, 3 December 2021
| |
Satanic Temple, The v. Belle Plaine, City of | |
---|---|
Filing Date | |
Original Jurisdiction | |
Plaintiff | The Satanic Temple Inc. |
Defendant | |
Intervenor | N/A |
State | |
Case# | |
Original Result | |
First Appeal | N/A |
Second Appeal | N/A |
Final Result |
Judge Dismisses Majority of Claims in Satanic Temple Lawsuit
- Nine out of 10 claims the Satanic temple made against the city of Belle Plaine in a lawsuit over a whether one of their monuments could be erected in Veteran's Park have been dismissed.
- U.S. Judge Wilhelmina Wright threw out the Temple's claims that the city's actions violated their free speech and exercise of religion.
- The remaining claim alleges that the city more or less breached a contract when they rescinded a permit allowing the monument.
- The Temple's attorney Matt Kezhaya told the Star Tribune that he plans to determine which of the dismissed claims can be raised again in a refiled complaint.